Les discours de la f(F)rancophonie au XXIe siecleenjeux culturels, ideologiques et politiques

  1. Berty, Romuald
unter der Leitung von:
  1. María del Mar García López Doktorvater/Doktormutter
  2. Xavier Garnier Doktorvater/Doktormutter

Universität der Verteidigung: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

Fecha de defensa: 23 von Juni von 2014

Gericht:
  1. Papa Samba Diop Präsident/in
  2. Odile Cazenave Sekretär/in
  3. Landry-Wilfrid Miampika Vocal
  4. María del Mar García López Vocal
  5. Josefina Bueno Alonso Vocal
  6. Xavier Garnier Vocal

Art: Dissertation

Teseo: 364551 DIALNET lock_openTDX editor

Zusammenfassung

The doctoral thesis carried out is based on francophonie discourse in the XXIth century, both from and about francophonie. This is a period in which official Francophonie arguments are based on the French republican model, as well as the values associated with it, which is obliged to renew itself within the present context whereby cultural identities are torn between globalisation and ethnicisation. For the purposes of the present research the term f(F)rancophonie shall be defined as the weaving of problematic and contradictory links, which are sources of symbolic violence, between francophonie, in terms of speakers as a whole, and institutional Francophonie. f(F)rancophonie discourse reveals the existence of political manipulation of language and culture through different ideological models of society. The multidisciplinary approach of the present investigation has enabled the updating of the problematical extension of cultural imperialism at work in the construction of French influence policy (soft power), notably thanks to discourse analysis and postcolonial thought theoretical tools. Indeed the francocentered institutional system provides pragmatic power to the Francophonie discursive strategy and to its rhetoric of struggle, influence and universalism against the anglo-american anti-model. At times the new cultural diversity paradigm struggles to conceal the conception of a French language which is the bearer of universalisation of one single cultural and national identity. The comment of language and literature through institutions sheds light on literary f(F)rancophonie discourse within which the francophone writer often appears obliged to compose with the colonial heritage of the French language which is haloed with prestige. Lastly the present analysis of francophone literary theories and studies examines the positions of writers in view of the interrelation between the French center and its peripheries.