Introducción. Reescrituras y reciclajes feministas en la literatura y las artes contemporáneas

  1. González Gil, Isabel 1
  2. Ori, Julia 1
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

Zeitschrift:
Impossibilia

ISSN: 2174-2464

Datum der Publikation: 2024

Titel der Ausgabe: Reescrituras y reciclajes feministas en la literatura y las artes contemporáneas / Feminist Rewritings and Recyclings in Contemporary Literature and Arts

Nummer: 27

Seiten: 1-10

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.30827/IMPOSSIBILIA.272024.30687 SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-85195682089 WoS: WOS:001255033200001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Impossibilia

Zusammenfassung

The present work is an introduction to the monographic issue "Feminist Rewritings and Recyclings in Contemporary Literature and the Arts," coordinated by Isabel González Gil and Julia Ori. It examines the theoretical and methodological issues of both concepts, as well as the most recent study perspectives, and provides an overview of the studies contained in the volume.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • BASSNETT, Susan y LEFEVERE, André (1990). Introduction: Proust’s Grandmother and the Thousand and One Nights. The Culture Turn in Translation Studies. En BASSNETT, Susan y LEFEVERE, André. Translation, History and Culture (1-13). Londres y Nueva York: Pinter Publishers.
  • BUTLER, Judith (1990 [2007]). Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Nueva York: Routledge.
  • CASTRO VÁZQUEZ, Olga (2008). Género y traducción: elementos discursivos para una reescritura feminista. Lectora, 14, 285-301.
  • CIXOUS, Hélène (1975 [2010]). Le Rire de la Méduse et autres ironies. París: Galilée.
  • DALY, Mary y CAPUTI, Jane (1987). Websters’ First New Intergalactic Wickedary of English Language. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • DAVIES, Bronwyn (1991). The concept of agency: A feminist poststructuralist analysis. Social Analysis, 0(30), 42. proquest.com/scholarly-journals/concept-agency-feminist-poststructuralist/docview/1300737772/se-2
  • FORRAI, Réka (2018). Translation as Rewriting: A modern theory for a premodern practice. Renaessanceforum, 14, 25-50.
  • FREDERICK, Michele L. (2015) Imitatio and Aemulatio: Reevaluating Aert de Gelder’s Self-Portrait as Zeuxis. Athanor 33: 43-53.
  • GAUVIN, Lise (2004). Écrire/Réécrire le/au féminin: notes sur une pratique. Études françaises, 40(1), 11–28. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.7202/008473ar
  • GENETTE, Gérard (1982). Palimpsestes: littérature au second degré. París: Éditions du Seuil.
  • GIGNOUX, Anne-Claire (2005). Initiation à l’intertextualité. París: Ellipses.
  • GIGNOUX, Anne-Claire (2006). De l'intertextualité à la récriture. Cahiers de Narratologie, 13. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.4000/narratologie.329
  • HARAWAY, Donna J. (1983 [2016]) A Cyborg Manifesto. Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. University of Minnesota Press. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=4392065.
  • KLUCINSKAS, Jean y MOSER, Walter (2004). Introduction: L’esthétique à l’épreuve du recyclage culturel. En KLUCINSKAS, Jean y MOSER, Walter (eds.). Esthétique et recyclages culturels: Explorations de la culture contemporaine (1-28). University of Ottawa Press, http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1ckphp1.4
  • KRISTEVA, Julia (1978 [1969]). Semeiotiké: recherches pour une sémantique. París: Seuil.
  • LAFON, Michel (1990). Borges ou la réécriture, París: Seuil.
  • LUQUE, Aurora (2020). Reciclando la caja de Pandora: La reescritura del mito en la poesía de Chantal Maillard, Olga Novo, Olalla Castro y Luis Artigue. Romance Notes, 60 (1), 87–92.
  • MARTÍN JIMÉNEZ, Alfonso (2015). La imitación y el plagio en el Clasicismo y los conceptos contemporáneos de intertextualidad e hipertextualidad. Dialogía, 9, 58-100.
  • MAUREL-INDART, Hélène (1999). Du plagiat. París: Presses Universitaire de France.
  • MOLINIÉ, George (1993). Les lieux du discours littéraire. En PLANTIN, Christian (dir.). Lieux communs. Topoï, stéréotypes, clichés. París: Kimé, 92-100.
  • MUKAŘOVSKÝ, Jan (1934 [2000]). El arte como hecho sígnico. En JANDOVÁ, Jarmila y VOLEK, Emil (eds.). Signo, función y valor. Estética y semiótica del arte en Jan Mukařovský. Santafé de Bogotá: Plaza & Janés, 88-95.
  • MULVEY, Laura (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3): 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/16.3.6
  • PLATE, Liedeke (2011). Transforming Memories in Contemporary Women’s Writing. Basingstoke/Nueva York: Palgrave McMillan.
  • OSTRIKER, Alicia (1982). The Thieves of Language: Women Poets and Revisionist Mythmaking, Signs, 8 (1): 68-90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3173482
  • RICH, Adrienne (1972). When We Dead Awaken: Writing as Re-Vision. College English, 34(1): 18-30. https://www.jstor.org/stable/375215
  • RUSS, Joanna (1995). To Write Like a Woman. Essays in Feminism and Science Fiction. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet